Skip To Content AreaSkip To Navigation Area
Site Search | E-mail | Login My AFMC
s
July 2008

 

HPMP removed from QIO Statement of Work

 
 "Effective August 1, 2008 with the beginning of their 9th Statement of Work, Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) will no longer be responsible for implementing the Hospital Payment Monitoring Program.
First, and most important, the provider education responsibilities of the HPMP are being delegated to other entities. Beginning August 1, Arkansas providers must direct their Medicare utilization and DRG questions elsewhere. However, many of the HPMP educational tools will remain available for a limited time. In particular, the HPMP Compliance Workbook will be available online through January 2009. This free downloadable workbook was written specifically to help compliance officers address Medicare DRG and utilization concerns. It is an excellent resource to help ensure that hospitals are compliant with Medicare rules and regulations and with the Medicare Conditions of Participation. It can also help compliance officers prepare for the upcoming Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) review.
What the future holds for PEPPER
 
CMS has announced that the PEPPER (Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report) data will be distributed to QIOs for each quarter of FY 2008; AFMC will receive this data through January 2009. We will provide PEPPER to Arkansas hospitals as long as the data is provided to us. Therefore, Arkansas hospitals can expect to receive three more PEPPERs, which will be distributed in August and November 2008, and February 2009. No announcement has been made about the plans for these reports after FY 2008.
 
Regular analyses of these reports can provide hospitals with comparative data in 15 target areas and can serve as a valuable tool to effectively prepare for the upcoming Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) review. The AFMC HPMP recommends that Arkansas providers pay close attention to where they stand compared to other hospitals in the "three-day stay discharged to SNF" target area, since Arkansas ranks high nationally in this category. Also, Arkansas providers should closely monitor the one-day stay target areas to identify additional aspects that may need improvement.
 
Speaking of the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) review

 
A thorough understanding of the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) processes that result in denied claims will be essential in avoiding such denials. Understanding the RAC review process, the target areas, and the available appeal methods will help providers build an effective defense against inappropriate claim denials.
 
A recently released report on the three-year RAC Demonstration Program is available here. As of March 2007, only 14% of the demonstration RAC adverse determinations have been appealed. However, many providers are pursuing full adjudication (taking appeals to the second and third appeal levels). Good physician documentation that justifies and supports the need for inpatient hospital admission will be essential in a hospital's effort to keep deserved reimbursement. Because the RACs will not be required to obtain physician input into the medical necessity of inpatient admissions, a hospital's best defense against criteria-based denials will be physician documentation that fully justifies the medical decision to admit the patient to the inpatient setting.
 
Review in the QIO 9th Statement of Work